Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(2): 427-432, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37597819

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis increases the risk of periprosthetic fracture and loosening in hip arthroplasty. Many methods have been proposed to assess bone quality in X-rays, including both qualitative such as the Dorr classification and quantitative such as the Calcar-Canal Ratio (CCR) and Cortical-Thickness index/Canal-Bone ratio (CTI/CBR). The Canal-Diaphysis ratio (CDR) has been described as a predictor for hip fragility fractures; however, its relationship with bone mineral density (BMD) has not been described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation of the Dorr classification, CCR, CTI/CBR, and CDR with BMD of the proximal femur in patients without hip fracture. METHODS: Forty-seven patients over 45 years of age who had less than 6 months between radiographs and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were evaluated. Measurements of CCR, CBR, CDR, and Dorr classification were performed in all radiographs by 2 independent observers. RESULTS: The CDR had a high correlation (r = 0.74, P=<0.01) with BMD, whereas the CTI/CBR had a moderate correlation (r = 0.49, P=<0.01), and the CCR had no correlation with BMD (r = 0.06, P = .96). When evaluating the receiver operating characteristic curve, CDR showed the best performance (area under curve [AUC] = 0.75) followed by CBR (AUC = 0.73) and CCR (AUC = 0.61). The optimal cutoff value for the CDR was 0.49, with 100% sensitivity and 58% specificity. The inter- and intra-observer variability was good for all methods. No differences were found between Dorr classification of patients who had or did not have osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: Of all the analyzed methods, the CDR was found to have the best correlation with BMD. This study proposes the use of CDR as a tool for assessing bone quality when deciding the implant fixation method in hip arthroplasty.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Osteoporose , Humanos , Lactente , Diáfises , Densidade Óssea , Absorciometria de Fóton , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Osso e Ossos , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fêmur/cirurgia
2.
Am J Biol Anthropol ; 177(4): 669-689, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36787708

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Long bone variations during growth are susceptible to the combined action of nutritional, hormonal, and genetic factors that may modulate the mechanical forces acting upon growing individuals as they progressively acquire a mature gait. In this work, we explore diaphyseal length and breadth variations of tibia and fibula during ontogeny (a) to test the presence of changes in relation to early toddling, and (b) to further our understanding of developmental patterns in relation to sex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lengths, breadths, and indices were analyzed on right and left leg bones of 68 subadult individuals (Human Identified Skeletal Collection of the University of Bologna, Italy). Analyses included intersex and age classes (1, 0-1 year; 2, 1.1-3 years; 3, 3.1-6 years) comparisons, linear regressions with age and assessment of correlation among tibial and fibular measurements, as well as principal component analysis. RESULTS: A significant difference emerged among age class 1 and the others. Age class 1 and 3 differ between them, while age class 2 overlaps with the others. No sex dimorphism was detected. All measurements were strongly correlated with age. Tibial and fibular measurements correlated with each other. CONCLUSIONS: Our results relate the progressive emergence of toddling attempts in growing individuals at the end of the first year of age. No significant sex differences were found, suggesting that tibial and fibula growth might diverge between sexes in later childhood. We provide quantitative data regarding tibial and fibular linear growth and its timing in a modern documented osteological sample from Italy.


Assuntos
Fíbula , Tíbia , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Diáfises , Perna (Membro) , Itália
3.
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil ; 24(4): 251-261, 2022 Aug 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36722498

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Humeral shaft fractures are relatively rare in children, with incidence between 0.4% and 3% of all fractures in children and between 10% and 20% of all humeral fractures. The purpose of our study was to retrospectively evaluate all humeral shaft fractures treated at children's trauma center from january 2012 till december 2021. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the group of 104 skeletally immature patients with humeral shaft fracture treated in our hospital. We have analyzed: age; sex; fracture type, management; time of bone healing; final effect and complications. RESULTS: The non-surgical group consisted of 73 patients (27 girls and 46 boys) with an average age of 8.03 (0.6 - 17.7), while the surgical group consisted of 31 patients (16 girls and 15 boys) with an average age of 12.47 (5,7- 17.8). The mean follow-up was 7.65 months (4-12) in non-surgical group, and 13.38 months (4-24) in surgical group. We have analyzed the results statistically, confirming increase the frequency of the above-mentioned fractures and increase the number of patients treated with surgery. We achieved good effect in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Humeral shaft fractures in children are relatively rare. Although in recent years, we have observed an increase of their frequency; 2. The vast majority of humeral shaft fractures are treated non-surgically with good clinical results; 3. Increase of number of patients treated surgically has been noticeable in the last decade; 4. Surgery is associated with a relatively low risk of complications and allows for cast withdrawal, which significantly improves the patients comfort.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Úmero , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Retrospectivos , Incidência , Fraturas do Úmero/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Úmero/cirurgia , Úmero , Diáfises
4.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 41(9): e833-e840, 2021 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34354027

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction using pasteurized tumor bone (PTM) and intramedullary-placed vascularized free fibular (VFG) has the combined advantages of mechanical strength and biological activity. The aims of this study were to investigate scintigraphic viability and radiographic union patterns of composite grafts after surgery, union rates, functional outcomes, and complication rates. METHODS: Seventeen patients underwent intercalary composite reconstruction using PTM and VFG (12 male, 2 female, mean age: 10.9 y). Retrospective evaluation of radiography and bone scintigraphy was performed. The most common diagnosis was osteosarcoma (12/14, 85.7%). All radiography and bone scintigraphy was reviewed for bone healing and tracer uptake semiquantitatively using the ratio of the reconstructed portion to the contralateral side. Complications and oncological and functional outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 33.1 months, primary union was achieved in all 28 host-graft junctions in all 14 patients. The respective mean times to proximal and distal junction bone union were 6.9 and 6.5 months. Metaphyseal junctions healed faster than diaphysis junctions (5.2 vs. 8.0 mo, P=0.02). Free fibular was integrated with surrounding bone after a mean of 10.1 months. The mean tracer uptake ratio was 1.1 after a mean of 4.8 months postoperatively. Half patients (50%) had higher uptake on bone scan than contralateral side. There was no significant correlation between uptake value and bone healing time. Five complications occurred in 4 patients (28.6%), and 1 patient (7.1%) contracted an infection. No fractures or breakages were observed. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 score was 87.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction using PTM combined with VFG is associated with good short-term biological activity as indicated by bone scintigraphy, a high union rate, and an acceptable complication rate. The technique is a useful reconstruction option for large segmental bone defects after tumor resection in lower extremities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic study.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Ósseas/cirurgia , Transplante Ósseo , Criança , Diáfises , Feminino , Fíbula/diagnóstico por imagem , Fíbula/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Cuad. Hosp. Clín ; 62(1): 25-32, jun. 2021. ilus.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1284248

RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN: las fracturas de humero corresponden del 1% al 2% de todas las fracturas en todo el cuerpo. La fractura de la diáfisis plantea problemas radicalmente distintos de los derivados de una fractura epifisaria. El hueso esponjoso diafisario es compacto, cuya consolidación se produce a través de mecanismos que contribuyen a la formación de callo de origen a la vez perióstica y endóstica. La reducción de una fractura epifisaria requiere gran precisión, mientras que el tratamiento de una fractura diafisaria debe tratar de respetar la longitud y los ejes del hueso y evitar cualquier desviación rotacional. OBJETIVO: el objetivo de la investigación es determinar cuál es la vía de acceso en el enclavado endomedular de las fracturas diafisiarias que presente una mejor recuperación funcional y vuelta a los rangos de movimientos normales de la articulación comprometida en el acceso quirúrgico intraoperatorio. MÉTODOS: se realizó un estudio en 20 pacientes que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión, siendo un estudio de tipo transversal, descriptivo, observacional, no experimental. Que tiene como delimitación temporal marzo 2018 hasta diciembre de 2019.Se usó la escala DASH para realizar la valoración funcional post quirúrgica comparando los resultados de los pacientes tratados por el acceso anterógrado o retrogrado. RESULTADOS: comparando ambas técnicas en el postoperatorio una vez consolidada la fractura mediante la escala DASH, la encuestada realizada a los pacientes mostro mayor discapacidad en el grupo anterógrado con puntuación de 38, el grupo retrogrado presento una puntuación de 15,2. Significancia asintótica 0,350 > 0,005.


INTRODUCTION: humeral fractures correspond to 1% to 2% of all fractures in the body. Diaphysis fracture poses radically different problems from epiphyseal fracture. The diaphyseal cancellous bone is compact, the consolidation of which occurs through mechanisms that contribute to the formation of callus of both periosteal and endosteal origin. The reduction of an epiphyseal fracture requires great precision, while the treatment of a diaphyseal fracture should try to respect the length and axes of the bone and avoid any rotational deviation. The main objective of the research is to determine which is the access route in the endomedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures that presents a better functional recovery and return to the normal ranges of movements of the compromised joint in intraoperative surgical access. METHODS: a study was conducted in 20 patients who met the inclusion criteria, being a cross-sectional, descriptive, observational, non-experimental study. The time limit was March 2018 to December 2019. The DASH scale was used to perform the post-surgical functional assessment comparing the results of patients treated by antegrade or retrograde access. RESULTS: comparing both techniques in the postoperative period, once the fracture was consolidated using the DASH scale, the survey applied to the patients showed greater disability in the antegrade group with a score of 38, the retrograde group presented a score of 15.2. Asymptotic significance 0.350> 0.005.


Assuntos
Período Pós-Operatório , Úmero , Diáfises , Fraturas do Úmero
7.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 15(1): 247, 2020 Jul 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32631381

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: External fixation improves open fracture management in emerging countries. However, sophisticated models are often expensive and unavailable. We assessed the biomechanical properties of a low-cost external fixation system in comparison with the Hoffmann® 3 system, as a reference. METHODS: Transversal, oblique, and comminuted fractures were created in the diaphysis of tibia sawbones. Six external fixators were tested in three modes of loading-axial compression, medio-lateral (ML) bending, and torsion-in order to determine construction stiffness. The fixator construct implies two uniplanar (UUEF1, UUEF2) depending the pin-rods fixation system and two biplanar (UBEF1, UBEF2) designs based on different bar to bar connections. The designed low-cost fixators were compared to a Hoffmann® 3 fixator single rod (H3-SR) and double rod (H3-DR). Twenty-seven constructs were stabilized with UUEF1, UUEF2, and H3-SR (nine constructs each). Nine constructs were stabilized with UBEF1, UBEF2, and H3-DR (three constructs each). RESULTS: UUEF2 was significantly stiffer than H3-SR (p < 0.001) in axial compression for oblique fractures and UUEF1 was significantly stiffer than H3-SR (p = 0.009) in ML bending for transversal fractures. Both UUEFs were significantly stiffer than H3-SR in axial compression and torsion (p < 0.05), and inferior to H3-SR in ML bending, for comminuted fractures. In the same fracture pattern, UBEFs were significantly stiffer than H3-DR (p = 0.001) in axial compression and torsion, while only UBEF1 was significantly stiffer than H3-DR in ML bending (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that the stiffness of the UUEF and UBEF device compares to the reference fixator and may be helpful in maintaining fracture reduction. Fatigue testing and clinical assessment must be conducted to ensure that the objective of bone healing is achievable with such low-cost devices.


Assuntos
Redução de Custos/economia , Diáfises/lesões , Fixadores Externos/economia , Fixação de Fratura/economia , Fixação de Fratura/instrumentação , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fraturas Cominutivas/cirurgia , Tíbia/lesões , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Desenho de Equipamento , Consolidação da Fratura , Humanos , Teste de Materiais , Modelos Anatômicos
8.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 40(8): e669-e675, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32251113

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies demonstrate considerable deviation from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures (PDFFs). This study aimed to determine if expert-consensus can be reached on a principle-based classification to be applied broadly to a wide variety of PDFF scenarios and if outcomes correspond to adherence to the classification. METHODS: A 2-stage study was performed. First, a survey of experts using a principle-based approach to PDFF. We conducted a survey of 17 thought-leaders (criteria≥20 y' experience+authors of the seminal pediatric femur fracture studies) who were asked to classify 15 cases of PDFF using the principle-based classification for agreement. Next, we conducted a retrospective review of 289 consecutive PDFF treated (2011-2015) at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. For each case, we compared the actual treatment and proposed "ideal" principle-based classification. We then compared clinical results and outcome data points including the length of stay, physician visits, and hospital charge data. RESULTS: A substantial (κ=0.7) expert-agreement was noted for assigning treatment principles with near-perfect (κ=0.93) agreement on conservative versus surgical management. We obtained agreement on employing a flexible implant (κ=0.84) rigid fixation (κ=0.75) and damage control philosophy (κ=0.64). Suboptimal clinical results were noted in 43% of the undertreated patients (24/56), 18.8% of the adequately treated, and 14.3% of overtreated (P<0.01) patients. An increasing trend for the length of hospital stay and a number of clinic visits was noted as the treatment class increased (P<0.01). Charges were 4.2 times higher for an episode of operative versus nonoperative care (P<0.01). Rigid fixation (class 4) had significantly (P=0.01) higher total and material charges than flexible fixation (class 3). DISCUSSION: The proposed classification has a substantial agreement among thought-leaders. Clinical results demonstrated significantly more suboptimal results in undertreated fractures, compared with ideally treated or more invasively treated fractures. More invasive treatments led to increased burden to families and the system in terms of length of stay and hospital charges. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador , Fraturas do Fêmur/classificação , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Sobremedicalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diáfises/lesões , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fêmur , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Preços Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Sobremedicalização/economia , Sobremedicalização/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
9.
Am J Phys Anthropol ; 172(3): 492-499, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32003457

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: South African Africans have been reported to have experienced negative or null secular trends in stature and other measures of skeletal structure across the 19th and 20th centuries, presumably due to poor living conditions during a time of intensifying racial discrimination. Here, we investigate whether any secular trend is apparent in limb bone strength during the same period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cadaver-derived skeletons (n = 221) were analyzed from female and male South African Africans who were born between 1839 and 1970, lived in and around Johannesburg, and died between 1925 and 1991 when they were 17-90 years of age. For each skeleton, a humerus and femur were scanned using computed tomography, and mid-diaphyseal cross-sectional geometric properties were calculated and scaled according to body size. RESULTS: In general linear mixed models accounting for sex, age at death, and skeletal element, year of birth was a significant (p < .05) negative predictor of size-standardized mid-diaphyseal cortical area (a proxy for resistance to axial loading) and polar moment of area (a proxy for resistance to bending and torsion), indicating a temporal trend toward diminishing limb bone strength. No significant interactions were detected between year of birth and age at death, suggesting that the decline in limb bone strength was mainly due to changes in skeletal maturation rather than severity of age-related bone loss. DISCUSSION: Limb bone strength is thus potentially another feature of the skeletal biology of South African Africans that was compromised by poor living conditions during the 19th and 20th centuries.


Assuntos
Apartheid/história , População Negra , Fêmur/anatomia & histologia , Úmero/anatomia & histologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antropologia Física , População Negra/história , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Diáfises/anatomia & histologia , Feminino , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , África do Sul , Adulto Jovem
10.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 29(1): 27-35, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563507

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Conventional treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures is nonoperative. Recent studies have implied that operative treatment might result in a faster return to work, resulting in a decreased productivity loss for society. The cost utility of plate fixation vs. nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures has not previously been investigated using a societal perspective. METHODS: Decision analytical modeling of incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) was performed. Data on utility, hospitalization, and productivity costs were retrieved from a Danish randomized controlled trial. Supplementary data were taken from randomized controlled trials identified in the literature. A 1-year time horizon was applied, and all prices were reported with respect to a 2016 level. RESULTS: Operative treatment was associated with a larger QALY gain in patients and a higher cost compared with nonoperative treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated in Danish currency (Danish krone [kr]) at kr1,360,000 (€182,306) per QALY from a health-sector perspective and kr1,388,738 (€186,158) per QALY from a societal perspective. Considering a subgroup analysis of patients with a high-load shoulder profession, operative treatment was dominated by nonoperative treatment from a health-sector perspective. Considering a societal perspective, the ICER was estimated at -kr889,091 (-€119,181) per reduction of 1 QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the results were subject to uncertainty. CONCLUSION: Operative treatment is not cost-effective when considering a threshold of €34,000/QALY. However, for a subgroup of patients with a high-load shoulder profession, operative treatment might be cost-effective compared with nonoperative treatment.


Assuntos
Clavícula/lesões , Tratamento Conservador/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Fraturas Ósseas/economia , Fraturas Ósseas/terapia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/economia , Placas Ósseas , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Dinamarca , Diáfises/lesões , Eficiência , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
PLoS One ; 14(11): e0225254, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31747420

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The burden of musculoskeletal trauma is growing worldwide, disproportionately affecting low-income countries like Malawi. However, resources required to manage musculoskeletal trauma remain inadequate. A detailed understanding of the current capacity of Malawian public hospitals to manage musculoskeletal trauma is unknown and necessary for effective trauma system development planning. METHODS: We developed a list of infrastructure, manpower, and material resources used during treatment of adult femoral shaft fractures-a representative injury managed non-operatively and operatively in Malawi. We identified, by consensus of at least 7 out of 10 experts, which items were essential at district and central hospitals. We surveyed orthopaedic providers in person at all 25 district and 4 central hospitals in Malawi on the presence, availability, and reasons for unavailability of essential resources. We validated survey responses by performing simultaneous independent on-site assessments of 25% of the hospitals. RESULTS: No district or central hospital in Malawi had available all the essential resources to adequately manage femoral fractures. On average, district hospitals had 71% (range 41-90%) of essential resources, with at least 15 of 25 reporting unavailability of inpatient ward nurses, x-ray, external fixators, gauze and bandages, and walking assistive devices. District hospitals offered only non-operative treatment, though 24/25 reported barriers to performing skeletal traction. Central hospitals reported an average of 76% (71-85%) of essential resources, with at least 2 of 4 hospitals reporting unavailability of full blood count, inpatient hospital beds, a procedure room, an operating room, casualty/A&E department clinicians, orthopaedic clinicians, a circulating nurse, inpatient ward nurses, electrocardiograms, x-ray, suture, and walking assistive devices. All four central hospitals reported barriers to performing skeletal traction. Operative treatment of femur fracture with a reliable supply of implants was available at 3/4 hospitals, though 2/3 were dependent entirely on foreign donations. CONCLUSION: We identified critical deficiencies in infrastructure, manpower, and essential resources at district and central hospitals in Malawi. Our findings provide evidence-based guidance on how to improve the musculoskeletal trauma system in Malawi, by identifying where and why essential resources were unavailable when needed.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur/terapia , Número de Leitos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Distrito/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Diáfises/lesões , Fraturas do Fêmur/economia , Fraturas do Fêmur/epidemiologia , Humanos , Malaui , Recursos Humanos/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 1965, 2019 02 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30760752

RESUMO

As a sub-study of the China National Fracture Study, this study aimed to better determine the incidence and risk factors of humeral shaft fracture in mainland China. We obtained all the data on humeral shaft fracture from the China National Fracture Study reported in 2017. Trained research teams personally interviewed all qualifying household members using a standardised questionnaire. A total of 512,187 (259649 boys and men, 252538 girls and women) questionnaires were collected and analysed from 112 neighbourhood communities and 223 administrative villages using stratified random sampling and the probability proportional to size method. The population-weighted incidence rate of humeral shaft fracture was 7.22 (95% confidence interval 4.90, 9.55) per 100,000 populations in 2014. Previous fracture history was an independent risk factor in adults of both sexes. Smoking was identified as an independent risk factor for humeral shaft fracture for men. Alcohol consumption and menstruation ceasing before the age of 46 years were considered as independent risk factors for women. Given the above data, specific public-health policies focusing on promoting a smoke-free environment and reducing alcohol intake should be encouraged. People who have had a fracture and women whose menstruation had ceased before the age of 46 should be vigilant against humeral shaft fracture.


Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Fraturas do Úmero/epidemiologia , Úmero/lesões , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China/epidemiologia , Demografia , Diáfises/lesões , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Características de Residência , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
13.
World J Surg ; 43(1): 87-95, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30094638

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In many low- and middle-income countries, non-surgical management of femoral shaft fractures using skeletal traction is common because intramedullary (IM) nailing is perceived to be expensive. This study assessed the cost of IM nailing and skeletal traction for treatment of femoral shaft fractures in Malawi. METHODS: We used micro-costing methods to quantify the costs associated with IM nailing and skeletal traction. Adult patients who sustained an isolated closed femur shaft fracture and managed at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Malawi were followed from admission to discharge. Resource utilization and time data were collected through direct observation. Costs were quantified for procedures and ward personnel, medications, investigations, surgical implants, disposable supplies, procedures instruments and overhead. RESULTS: We followed 38 nailing and 27 traction patients admitted between April 2016 and November 2017. Nailing patient's average length of stay (LOS) was 36.35 days (SD 21.19), compared to 61 (SD 18.16) for traction (p = 0.0003). The total cost per patient was $596.97 ($168.81) for nailing and $678.02 (SD $144.25) for traction (p = 0.02). Major cost drivers were ward personnel and overhead; both are directly proportional to LOS. Converting patients from traction to nailing is cost-saving up to day 23 post-admission. CONCLUSION: Savings from IM nailing as compared with skeletal traction were achieved by shortened LOS. Although this study did not assess the effectiveness of either intervention, the literature suggests that traction carries a higher rate of complications than nailing. Investment in IM nailing capacity may yield substantial net savings to health systems, as well as improved clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas do Fêmur/economia , Fraturas do Fêmur/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tração/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pinos Ortopédicos , Diáfises/lesões , Diáfises/cirurgia , Feminino , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Malaui , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
14.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 39(5): e355-e359, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30531250

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures remains controversial, particularly in children between the ages of 6 and 10. In the current push toward cost containment, hospital type, and surgeon subspecialization have emerged as important factors influencing this treatment decision. Thus, in the present study, we use a nationwide pediatric inpatient database to compare the: (a) incidence; (b) demographic characteristics; (c) hospital costs; (d) length of stay; and (e) treatment method of pediatric closed femoral shaft fractures admitted to general versus children's hospitals. METHODS: The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was queried for all patients aged 6 to 10 who sustained a closed femoral shaft fracture in 2009 or 2012, and patient records were stratified into children's hospitals and general hospitals. Primary outcome measures included method of treatment, total hospital costs, and length of stay. Student/Welch t testing and χ analysis were utilized to compare continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively, between hospital types. RESULTS: The total incidence of closed femoral shaft fractures decreased between 2009 and 2012 (1919 to 1581 patients; P=0.020), as did the proportion of patients treated in children's hospitals (58.6% to 32.3%; P<0.001). In addition, patients treated at general hospitals were more likely to receive open reduction with internal fixation (45.3% vs. 41.1%) or external fixation (4.1% vs. 2.3%), and less likely to be managed with closed reduction with internal fixation (32.0% vs. 39.7%) than those treated at children's hospitals (P<0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates a decrease in the incidence of closed femoral shaft fractures in 6- to 10-year old patients from 2009 to 2012, as well as decreased definitive management in children's hospitals and increased selection of operative treatment. In addition, treatment in a nonchildren's hospital was associated with decreased total inpatient costs and decreased treatment with closed reduction with internal fixation in favor of open reduction with internal fixation. Future studies should seek to identify the specific surgical procedures performed and match patients more closely based specific fracture pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level II.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur , Fêmur , Fixação de Fratura , Criança , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Diáfises , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico , Fraturas do Fêmur/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fixação de Fratura/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais Pediátricos/classificação , Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
15.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 38(3): e111-e117, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29324528

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Clinical Practice Guidelines for pediatric femoral shaft fractures indicate titanium elastic nails (TENs) for children 5 to 11 years old. Growing evidence suggests these fractures may also be treated with open or submuscular plating. The purpose of this study was to compare estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, fluoroscopy time, cost, and subjective and objective pain scores between TENs and plating techniques used in 5- to 11-year-old children with midshaft femur fractures based on length stability. We hypothesized that EBL, operative time, and fluoroscopy time would be greater and pain would be lower with plate fixation. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all pediatric midshaft femur fractures treated with TENs, submuscular plating, or open plating between 2004 and 2014. Demographic, injury, and surgical data were obtained for analysis. Cost data were obtained from Synthes Inc. Outcomes were determined using the TEN outcome scoring system. Variables were compared between the 3 fixation methods using paired t tests or Fisher exact test as appropriate. Cost data were compared with Mann-Whitney nonparametric test. RESULTS: There were 65 midshaft femur fractures in 63 patients included. TENs accounted for 77% and plating 23%. There were no statistical differences in injury severity score, length of stay, length unstable fractures, open fractures, fluoroscopy time, or pain. However, there was a significantly greater operative time (P=0.007) and a notably greater EBL (P=0.057) for the plating technique compared with TENs. Patient outcomes were found to be equivalent. Implant cost was not significantly different although increased surgical costs were seen in plating (P=0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of TENs or plating for midshaft femur fractures in children 5 to 11 years old, regardless of length stability. The use of plates resulted in higher EBL, longer operative time, increased cost, and equivalent pain compared with TENs. To our knowledge, this study represents the first direct comparison of the common fixation methods specifically for midshaft femur fractures and favors the use of TENs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Assuntos
Pinos Ortopédicos , Placas Ósseas , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diáfises , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/economia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Titânio/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Int Orthop ; 42(2): 247-258, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29273837

RESUMO

The intention of the current article is to review the epidemiology with related socioeconomic costs, pathophysiology, and treatment options for diaphyseal long bone delayed unions and nonunions. Diaphyseal nonunions in the tibia and in the femur are estimated to occur 4.6-8% after modern intramedullary nailing of closed fractures with an even much higher risk in open fractures. There is a high socioeconomic burden for long bone nonunions mainly driven by indirect costs, such as productivity losses due to long treatment duration. The classic classification of Weber and Cech of the 1970s is based on the underlying biological aspect of the nonunion differentiating between "vital" (hypertrophic) and "avital" (hypo-/atrophic) nonunions, and can still be considered to represent the basis for basic evaluation of nonunions. The "diamond concept" units biomechanical and biological aspects and provides the pre-requisites for successful bone healing in nonunions. For humeral diaphyseal shaft nonunions, excellent results for augmentation plating were reported. In atrophic humeral shaft nonunions, compression plating with stimulation of bone healing by bone grafting or BMPs seem to be the best option. For femoral and tibial diaphyseal shaft fractures, dynamization of the nail is an atraumatic, effective, and cheap surgical possibility to achieve bony consolidation, particularly in delayed nonunions before 24 weeks after initial surgery. In established hypertrophic nonunions in the tibia and femur, biomechanical stability should be addressed by augmentation plating or exchange nailing. Hypotrophic or atrophic nonunions require additional biological stimulation of bone healing for augmentation plating.


Assuntos
Diáfises/lesões , Fraturas Ósseas/complicações , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Pinos Ortopédicos , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e Tecidos/métodos , Diáfises/cirurgia , Feminino , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/economia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
J Orthop Trauma ; 31(10): e334-e338, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28650944

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes and costs between titanium elastic nails (TENs), stainless steel elastic nails (SENs), and Kirschner wires (K-wires) in the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures with intramedullary fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 100 patients (65 male and 35 female) younger than 18 years with diaphyseal forearm fractures treated with intramedullary fixation were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients received single or both bone intramedullary fixation with either TENs, SENs, or K-wires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Time to radiographic union, complication rate, surgical time, and average cost per implant. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included in the study. Thirty-one patients were treated with TENs, 30 with SENs, and 39 with K-wires. No significant difference in time to radiographic union, complication rate, or surgical time was found between the 3 types of fixation. Average time to union was 9.4 ± 5.4 weeks, and complication rate was 12.9% for TENs, 10.0% for SENs, and 12.8% for K-wires. There was a significant difference in cost per implant, with an average cost of $639, $172, and $24 for TENs, SENs, and K-wires, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates no difference between TENs, SENs, and K-wires in the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures with regards to outcome, time to union, surgical time, or complication rates. Given the significant cost difference between these implants, we recommend that surgeons consider modifying their implant selection to help mitigate cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Pinos Ortopédicos , Fios Ortopédicos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Fraturas da Ulna/cirurgia , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Diáfises/lesões , Diáfises/cirurgia , Feminino , Traumatismos do Antebraço/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Antebraço/cirurgia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Fraturas do Rádio/diagnóstico por imagem , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Aço Inoxidável , Titânio , Fraturas da Ulna/diagnóstico por imagem
18.
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) ; 15(59): 207-211, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30353894

RESUMO

Background Forearm fractures in pediatric population is usually managed conservatively. Unstable fractures need operative intervention like closed or open intramedullary nailing or open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws. However, there is no consensus regarding the method of treatment according to age group. Objective To standardize the use of elastic nailing system as effective form of treatment in terms of function, cost and lower complications as compared to widely used titanium nails in developed countries.Method Sixty eight pediatric patients with both bone forearm diaphyseal fractures were managed with closed reduction and intramedullary fixation with rush nail or k-wire and followed at least for 6 months for evaluation of radiological and functional outcome. Result Patients were divided into two age groups, Group A for age of 5 to 9 years (26 patients) and Group B for age of 10-15 years (42 patients). The mean time for union for Group A patient was 7.31 weeks which was significantly lower than that of Group B patients of 9.33 weeks (p-value < 0.05). All the patients in Group A had excellent outcome and 36 (85.7%) patients had excellent outcome and 6 (14.3%) had good outcome in Group B. 5 out of 68 cases (7.35 %) had minor complications (2 in Group A and 3 in Group B). The mean time for implant removal was 17.9 weeks in Group A and 22.9 in Group B. Conclusion Intramedullary fixation for unstable diaphyseal both bone fractures of forearm is safe and cost effective method of treatment with good to excellent functional outcome with union time being significantly lower in younger age group.


Assuntos
Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas do Rádio/terapia , Fraturas da Ulna/terapia , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Pinos Ortopédicos/economia , Pinos Ortopédicos/normas , Fios Ortopédicos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diáfises/lesões , Feminino , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/economia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
J Arthroplasty ; 31(5): 1117-22, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26781395

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Correct assessment of femoral stem torsion is crucial in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we aimed to compare a recently published novel method based on anteroposterior (AP) hip radiographs using the projected caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle (AP CCD) with the modified posteroanterior Budin view. METHOD: AP radiographs, modified Budin views, and 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images were obtained in 30 patients after minimally invasive, cementless THA. Radiographic measurements performed by 4 observers twice in a 6-week interval were compared with 3D-CT measurements. Furthermore, correlations between the radiographic deviation to 3D-CT and patient specific characteristics were evaluated. RESULTS: We found a mean difference of 2.2 ± 6.8° between AP CCD and 3D-CT measurements of femoral stem torsion and -0.5 ± 4.2° between the modified Budin view and 3D-CT. We found a high correlation between mean radiographic and 3D-CT stem torsion (r = 0.78, P < .001 for AP CCD and r = 0.84, P < .001 for Budin view). The observers had excellent agreements within (intraclass correlation coefficient, ≥0.88 for AP CCD and intraclass correlation coefficient, ≥0.94 for Budin view) and between (mean concordance correlation coefficient, ≥0.79 for AP CCD and concordance correlation coefficient, ≥0.86 for Budin view) their radiographic measurements. CONCLUSION: Both radiographic methods enable a simple orientation and a practical conventional radiographic estimation of stem torsion on hip radiographs after THA. However, CT remains the golden standard for exact estimation of stem torsion.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Mau Alinhamento Ósseo/diagnóstico por imagem , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Prótese de Quadril , Anormalidade Torcional/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Diáfises/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Fêmur/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
20.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 36(8): 821-828, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26090976

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes and cost variations between uniplanar (UNI) and Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) external fixation for unstable pediatric tibial diaphyseal fractures. METHODS: We performed an IRB approved, retrospective review of 44 diaphyseal tibial fractures in 42 children treated with external fixation (16 TSF and 28 UNI) between 2003 and 2011, at a single level 1 pediatric trauma center. Data on demographic, clinical, radiographic, treatment cost, and complication differences were analyzed between the 2 groups. The Student t tests, Fisher's exact tests, χ trend tests, logistic regression, and a cost analysis comparison was used to assess the differences. RESULTS: The mean age in both groups was 13 years (range: 6 to 18 y TSF, 9 to 17 y UNI). The mean follow-up was 8 months (TSF) and 13 months (UNI). According to the AO classification, there were 28 type A, 13 type B, and 3 type C fractures with no significant difference between the 2 groups (P=0.69). Total time in the fixator was not different between the 2 groups (UNI 14 wk, TSF 12 wk, P=0.10), but time to union was less in the TSF group (UNI 16 wk, TSF 13 wk, P<0.01). There were no differences in the final radiographic alignment between the groups. The UNI group experienced more complications (7 pin-site infections and 9 reoperations) compared with 4 pin-site infections and 2 reoperations in the TSF group. A cost analysis revealed significant differences in equipment cost (UNI frame=$5074 vs. TSF frame=$10,675; P<0.0001); however, after corrected cost analysis with calculated return to the operating room for complications, there was no difference in cost of treatment (UNI treatment=$20,113 vs. TSF treatment=$19,138). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an initial equipment cost difference between UNI and TSF frames, corrected cost analysis reveals equivalent costs for care delivery. Therefore, TSF can be considered as a cost-conscious device for the treatment of unstable pediatric tibial diaphyseal fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative cohort study.


Assuntos
Fixadores Externos , Fixação de Fratura/instrumentação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Tíbia/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diáfises/lesões , Diáfises/cirurgia , Feminino , Fixação de Fratura/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tíbia/lesões , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA